0 votes
74 views
asked in Engg-aptitude by (215k points)
Today, we consider Ashoka as a great ruler because of the copious evidence he left behind in the form of stone carved edicts. Historians tend to correlate greatness of a kind at his time with the availability of evidence today.

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above sentences?

      (a) Emperors who do not leave significant sculpted evidence are completely forgotten.

      (b) Ashoka produced stone carved edicts to ensure that later historians will respect him.

      (c) Statues of kings are reminder of their greatness.

      (d) A King’s greatness, as we know him today, is interpreted by historians.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

Welcome to Q&A discussion forum, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.

10.4k questions

274 answers

26 comments

14.6k users

...